Children and Technology Essay Example

Children and Technology Essay The power of todays technology can have control on childrens future. Parents should control their childrens access to technology because of the dangers it may have on their children. Therefore, children who have access to technology without the proper guidance can easily be addicted to video games, television and other electronic devices if allowed unsupervised. Without proper guidance, children can be dependent on technology, and have trouble with learning good morals, that may lead to disrespect towards their parents. Unsupervised children under the influence of technology may become detached and quickly drift away from their parents control. When parents do not properly supervise their children access to technology their children may become, addicted, and dependent, on technology that may result in becoming detached to their parents. Not all parents will agree that monitoring their childrens access to technology is a good idea. They do not believe children cannot become addicted because they think that all technology is educational. They believe that all technology is good and it keeps them occupied and can be used as a form of a baby sitter. In the story, The Veldt, George and Lydia Hadley have two children Peter and Wendy. The parents buy a fully automated home that does everything for them, cooking meals, and it caters to their children. The parents use this home to baby sit, and to raise their children. For children to be able to choose when and what technology they use it is even difficult for a physiologist to determine what is safe for children, nevertheless the parent and especially for a child. When a child is addicted to technology, they will do just about anything to get it. The home they purchased had a room called the nursery. The nursery is a virtual reality room that is able to connect with the ch ildren telepathically to reproduce any place they imagine. The Parents soon realize that there is something wrong We will write a custom essay sample on Children and Technology specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on Children and Technology specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on Children and Technology specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer

Free Essays on Search And Seizure

Search and Seizure The Fourth Amendment guarantees "the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures." The Founding Fathers of the constitution knew all too well how the king's soldiers and marshals had abused their power through sweeping searches of American homes before 1776 thus resulting in the creation of the Fourth Amendment. Despite the establishment of the Fourth Amendment, many years existed in which state and federal governments admitted evidence obtained through â€Å"unreasonable† search and seizures in criminal trials. The only criteria used by the judge were whether the evidence was incriminating and if it would assist in convicting the defendant. Through the years, the Supreme Court interpretation of the Fourth Amendment has changed due to the development of search and seizure law. The definition of â€Å"unreasonable† was first dealt with at the federal level in the 1914 case of Weeks v. United States. Federal law enforcement authorities accused the defendant, Freemont Weeks of using the mail for illegal purposes. After his arrest, the home in which Weeks was staying was searched without a valid search warrant. Evidence in the form of letters were found in his room and admitted in the trial. Weeks was then convicted of the federal offence based on incriminating evidence. The Supreme Court argued that evidence gathered in an illegal manner, without probable cause or without a search warrant, should be excluded from criminal trials. The exclusionary rule was adopted to prevent abuses by the police and other government officials. The logic followed that if police understand that evidence seized in a manner that violates any of the provisions of the Fourth Amendment will be excluded from court proceedings, they will less likely conduct searches withou t warrants or without probable cause. The Weeks decision only affected federal co... Free Essays on Search And Seizure Free Essays on Search And Seizure Search and Seizure The Fourth Amendment guarantees "the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures." The Founding Fathers of the constitution knew all too well how the king's soldiers and marshals had abused their power through sweeping searches of American homes before 1776 thus resulting in the creation of the Fourth Amendment. Despite the establishment of the Fourth Amendment, many years existed in which state and federal governments admitted evidence obtained through â€Å"unreasonable† search and seizures in criminal trials. The only criteria used by the judge were whether the evidence was incriminating and if it would assist in convicting the defendant. Through the years, the Supreme Court interpretation of the Fourth Amendment has changed due to the development of search and seizure law. The definition of â€Å"unreasonable† was first dealt with at the federal level in the 1914 case of Weeks v. United States. Federal law enforcement authorities accused the defendant, Freemont Weeks of using the mail for illegal purposes. After his arrest, the home in which Weeks was staying was searched without a valid search warrant. Evidence in the form of letters were found in his room and admitted in the trial. Weeks was then convicted of the federal offence based on incriminating evidence. The Supreme Court argued that evidence gathered in an illegal manner, without probable cause or without a search warrant, should be excluded from criminal trials. The exclusionary rule was adopted to prevent abuses by the police and other government officials. The logic followed that if police understand that evidence seized in a manner that violates any of the provisions of the Fourth Amendment will be excluded from court proceedings, they will less likely conduct searches withou t warrants or without probable cause. The Weeks decision only affected federal co...